I'm quite interested in your claim about the digital version sounding inferior to the vinyl even though the album was recorded digitally. If they didn't have to all the intermediate steps between the digital version and pressing the LP, why would the LP be better? Dynamics? EQ? Those are generally the differences I think of when it comes down to modern releases, but I don't think those apply here.
Because I compared the digital version to your vinyl transfer and I didn't find anything significant. I'd say it was mastered equally as well on each.
Now I'm generally the one who goes "aww shucks, they brought in a fancy mastering engineer for the vinyl version and left the rest of us with a boring, flatter version!" for a number of releases that I hear have been specially re-released on vinyl---based on needle drops. They tend to have a nicer EQ job and maybe have been created from a more dynamic master.
But here I hear no huge difference. There just a smidge of extra treble added on the vinyl. Even what I expect most modern vinyl releases to improve on, dynamics, doesn't seem significant or even present. There's some distortion on the vocals in a few places that exist on both your vinyl transfer as well as the digital version.
Honestly, I think such a statement should be reserved for when you only get a huge improvement in the mastering, not if both have been mastered by the same people!
I hope you don't take it as any disrespect Mr. Fremer, I really enjoy your articles, I just think that statement doesn't apply in every case, including this one.
Thanks!