Well that is as clear as Mud.
Kronos Audio Products to Introduce Lower Priced Sparta Turntable at the International CES Show
The dual-platters, spinning in opposite directions and driven by separate motors are said to solve the problem of "torsional forces" the company claims are inherent in typical spring suspended sub platter 'tables where the sub platter frame rotates in synch with the platter. In other words, as the platter spins, it produces frame movement because no platter, no matter how carefully balanced, is perfectly balanced.
While these torsional forces can be damped, the company claims its engineering completely eliminates torsional forces in its suspended designs, thus providing the isolation suspended 'tables can provide, without the torsional movement downside.
The company also claims that because the platter and arms of non-suspended designs are not isolated, both vibrations produced from within the system and those produced in the outside environment easily find their way into the system, producing sound that is "harsh, aggressive and glassy".
Naturally manufacturers of such turntables will beg to differ and probably have their own reasons to offer for why a dual platter, dual bearing, dual motor design produces its own set of issues, both mechanical and sonic.
The Kronos Sparta appears to be a beautifully manufactured and physically attractive design.
- Log in or register to post comments
Since I just own a Music Hall turntable, I find sentances like the following to be beyond comprehension; "While these torsional forces can be damped, the company claims its engineering completely eliminates torsional forces in its suspended designs, thus providing the isolation suspended 'tables can provide, without the torsional movement downside." Torsional to me means a twisting motion or force. Without this twisting force the platter wheather it be sub or otherwise does not spin. So I sometimes consider such stuff nonsense. Now if I was told that sub platter merely conterbalances the top platter, I would think that is valid statement. However I would think that the additional motor(s) required to drive the sub platter may cause more problems than it solves. I hope my thoughts are clearer than "Mud." But you shsould know that I do enjoy your columns and opinions.
Visually, I find this table much more approachable than the original. I prefer a design aesthetic that is cohesive rather than one where complexity is on display. I'm not qualified to evaluate its effectiveness though it would seem that the trade off in suspended tables is an inability to take full advantage of the stability of mass. The table can always be placed on a separate damping platform. Isolating the arm from the motor/ bearing seems worthwhile, it's not clear how that is accomplished here. Kuzuma's newest table claims to do this, I think, in an unsuspended design, though it's also unclear just how that is accomplished. This is more skeletle, where the Kuzuma relies on a massive carcass. That aesthetic is too boxy for my tastes.
Take an old toy top (for instance) like a 1970's Whizzzer or Battling Top that spins very fast and with a lot of force...Spinning at their fastest, they can develop such a turbulent motion that the top can actually start jumping around.
I can see that if you had the same situation on the other end of the same axle spinning in the opposite direction that it would dampen that turbulence considerably.
Thanks Mr. Fremer
.....and got to spin some of my records on a Kronos. He is an interesting character, and really believes in what he is doing. Whether his theories are true or not, I couldn't say, but he does get excellent sound from his tables.
He is also one of those guys who loves to flip through the $1 bins and pull out interesting old records to play. He definitely had some rather unusual LPs in his box at the show, rather than reissues of the same old stuff that everybody uses.