While I don't begrudge getting the best possible sound from records I'm a little sanguine about the inclusion of "Little Broken Hearts" in the set and not because of Danger Mouse's, banal, low fi aesthetic (if ever there was an oxymoron, that's it ...)
Rather, it's the curious timing of an audiophile iteration that occurs at the same time as original's "we made it for iTunes" existence. The standard $20 LP is a 2-disk, 180gm on "fancy" white vinyl, the kind of thing a collector or audiophile might want.
And yet the 24/44.1k digital master apparently holds enough treasures for Gray to be hired to remaster for a 200gm? Can you call it a "remaster" if the body's not even cold yet on the original?
Waiter, check please!
Last year I paid an additional $5 to get the 180gm version of a new title so that my Audiophile Club card didn't get revoked by buying the 150gm version sitting next to it. So it's all my fault. I don't mind paying for reissues later, when new masterings are possible, but this Good/Better/Best mentality record labels have with brand-new LP titles is ... too much.
On the other hand perhaps this is just how it's done today. Remasters right up front that for whatever reason sound better. Case in point: The El Camino 2xLP 45rpm version doesn't sound "like an MP3" as you once wrote nor like the standard LP you reviewed. I'm not claiming it transforms into a sonic marvel but it's clearly better.