Man, that's a long tone arm.You could probably play those old 16" transcription records on it.It's unique, and a conversation piece, and i'll bet it sounds good.
The Well Tempered Royale 400 Is For Those Who Like It Long
The Bill Firebaugh designed 'table features an approximately twenty five inch by twenty one inch plinth of baltic plywood sandwiched by two thick aluminum plates. The 'table and arm combo weighs in at around a hundred pounds.
A proprietary rubber damping material is between the plinth layers as well as between the motor and tone arm mounting plate. An electronic servo system controls the motor. As always the tone arm bearing utilizes a golf ball suspended in silicone fluid, which on this model is well-hidden.
- Log in or register to post comments
I have been using the original Well Tempered Arm for years now and love the sound of it.
Could you elucidate what the benefits of a 16'' arm to this Luddite!
James, Dublin, Ireland
I don't want to speak for Bill Firebaugh, but he's unlikely to see this post so I'll just reiterate some of what we spoke about in the room. While the usual argument for length is the reduction of tracking error, this was not Bill's primary goal. Rather it was the reduction of skating force (which is directly related to offset angle, which decreases as you lengthen the arm). The longer the pivot-to-stylus distance gets the closer to zero offset angle and zero skating force you get.
I must say that I didn't know what to expect before the show, but my experience with other Well Tempered designs gave me hope. I needn't have been concerned though, the 'table and arm were a joy to use and in my opinion sounded excellent.
--John DeVore
Top Banana, DeVore Fidelity Ltd
to verify this conclusion? Or compare other arms of varying lengths on the same 'table (e.g., 9", 10", 10" Pro-Ject or VPI JMW, or SME, etc.)? I have no doubt that SAT is the best 'arm you've heard, and have nothing to say against Mr. Gomez's engineering bona fides (and I downloaded the Led Zep and The Band tracks when available), but I'm suggesting that unless we compare, do we know whether it sounds good in spite of the design decisions, or because of it? As with digital, the theory and the reality (the listening experience), and what we later learn about the reality to explain why the theory was a little off... It seems the reviews I've read of SME and VPI 'tables suggest the longer arm does yield some benefits, although with SME, the 'tables change to accommodate the arm, so it's still not apples to apples.
Best of luck finding an alignment gauge that will work with that P2S distance.
I have 3 WT's - the original WTT with alignment gauge, the WTRP with alignment gauge and a self-modified WT Simplex with a WTRP platter, bearing and spindle, a bottom base for added depth and a self-built Simplex/Amadeus ll arm and suspension, with some parts 3D printed. While the new WT's tabes come with a fixed mount and no tracking gauge, I built adjustability into my arm and find a gauge helpful.
Talking with others, the only benefit I see with a 16" arm tube is the arc from outer edge of platter to spindle is much flatter than say with a traditional 9" tonearm. But I still wonder how much more wobbly or deflection you will get with a 16" arm vs a 9" arm...None of us want our tonearms bouncing up and down.
Ever use one?
Nothing "wobbly" about it.
No...that's why I said "I still wonder", but it makes sense that a longer pole will be suspect to bounce. I will not ever use one, the only benefit is reducing the arc. Having such a huge plinth creates more chances of vibration..I'm good with a 9" arm.
My "Did you listen to it?" was for MF.
That arm has to need some Viagra. Hard to keep anything that long stiff I would think.
... ccarbon fibre. It's stiff, baby.
OK, I've got a degree in physics, so if this is a dumb question, I have no excuse. But why in the world would no alignment guage be required for an arm like this? The angle between the tonearm and the radius of the LP still changes as a function of the stylus's distance from the spindle. Wouldn't you still want to minimize the resulting tracking error?